Would a pardon really be justice for Alan Turing?



Continue reading page |1 |2


The legendary computer scientist and codebreaker may finally get a posthumous pardon. It's just dust and posturing, says a modern-day virtual reality pioneer


What do we do with the knowledge that people not all that different from ourselves have behaved with astounding stupidity and cruelty, over and over again, in the recent past? Become paranoid of ourselves?


This is the kind of question that haunts me when I think of Alan Turing. For those who don't know, Turing was the most essential mathematician leading to the invention of computers and the birth of my discipline, computer science. I couldn't owe him more. He was also one of the greatest war heroes we have known, for he applied computer science in its birthing hour to break Enigma, a notorious Nazi code, and is generally thought to have shortened the course of the second world war by perhaps two years. He might have saved millions of lives, even nations.


We're not done. In the years before his death in 1954, Turing made a huge contribution to philosophy and culture by articulating the underpinnings of artificial intelligence, including what has come to be known as the famous "Turing test" thought experiment. And yet he did that with a degree of sophistication – including a dose of salutary self-doubt – that derivative AI enthusiasts rarely achieve.


Illegal state of being


If only this wonderful roster could suffice as a summary of a great life. Alas, we must also remember how Turing died. He was gay at a time when that was an illegal state of being. He was prosecuted after the war and subjected to "chemical castration". He apparently killed himself, eating an apple laced with cyanide, at age 41. We will never know what further gifts he could have given.


Now, after decades of murmurs and false starts, it appears the UK government will produce a posthumous pardon. How can we think about this?


It isn't easy. Of course the prosecution of Turing was an abomination. But as present-day observers, are we stroking ourselves on the back a little too readily by suggesting we now have the perspicuity from which to declare a pardon to this one brilliant man? What about the almost 50,000 other men in the UK convicted in the same way? Do you have to be one of the highest-performing people of the century to merit a pardon under an immoral law that has been repudiated?


The very idea of a pardon suggests that the government speaks from a moral high ground and that the prosecution might have been inadvertently based on false evidence or some other bloodless mistake. There is a degree of implicit misrepresentation, though it is never easy for a government to own up to its own failings. (It took about a century and a half after the official end of slavery in the US for the government to finally state an apology, which was intoned by President Bill Clinton.)


Confused message


The notion of pardon sends a confused message. Shouldn't there be an apology to all those convicted, directed to their memory and their descendants? I am not a British citizen, but as a computer scientist, I think I have some small standing to voice a complaint.


I have always wanted to get more of a sense of Turing, the person. The historian George Dyson has done wonderful work bringing the earliest chapters of computer science to light; his books are a fine place to start. But I got a glimpse of the man earlier this year, when I was speaking in Victoria, Canada, about the gratitude all of us in computer science feel toward Turing.


Afterwards, an elderly woman named Olive Bailey was introduced to me. She was lovely, formal and yet quite emotional, for you see, she was one of the last remaining members of the codebreaking team that worked with Turing at Bletchley Park. (During the war years and for some time thereafter, a window of opportunity opened for technically gifted women. This pattern wasn't unique to Britain. In the US, when the brightest male techies were corralled into industrial-scale high-tech projects like nuclear weapons or long-range missiles, women were often recruited to work in the still-new field of software. Grace Hopper, for instance, led a mostly female team to develop the first code compiler.)


Nerdy yet colourful


One thing Olive told me was that Turing was not a person who revealed a great deal of himself in the lab, but he did set the tone for how to do computer science, and she feels that tone living on through computer researchers today, even if it's not clear how to articulate exactly what it entails. Turing was both a prototype of the "nerdy" personality we associate with digital technology today, and a romantic, daring, colourful soul.


In pure mathematics, it is commonly recognised that while the maths itself is abstract, the way we understand it is cultural, and therefore it is relevant to know the human stories behind mathematical advances. We benefit from knowing about Paul Erdös's eccentric, rambling life, for instance, because it informs our appreciation of his rambling accomplishments. Understanding a little about him helps us enter into his mindset and trace his steps.



Continue reading page |1 |2


If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.



Have your say

Only subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.


Only personal subscribers may leave comments on this article


Subscribe now to comment.




All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.


If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.