Slivers of a second after the universe was born, it ballooned at nearly the speed of light. This vision of cosmic expansion, called inflation, got a big boost last week with the announcement of the first sighting of primordial gravitational waves, ripples in space-time linked to the universe's rapid growth spurt.
The findings – reported by the team that ran the BICEP2 experiment at the South Pole – are already helping physicists sort through the mountain of theories for how inflation happened.
But there are a few wrinkles, including the fact that hints of the waves seem much more pronounced than they should be, according to previous observations of the early universe. Resolving the discrepancies – perhaps using results due out later this year from the Planck space telescope – might give a glimpse of physics from before the big bang. Or it might mean inflation is out, and that we actually have the first whiff of evidence for string theory.
"Everyone was celebrating and so forth, but you have to be careful with this result," says Avi Loeb at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. "That's why the Planck data is so interesting to watch for."
Inflation's particle
The BICEP2 telescope used its vantage point at the South Pole to hunt for hints of gravitational waves in a patch of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) – the relic light emitted about 380,000 years after the big bang. Existing CMB maps from Planck depicted an early universe that was almost uniformly smooth, with only tiny variations in density. This seemed to support inflation, because the variations we see are too small for matter to have expanded slowly after the big bang.
The Planck team reported no signs of gravitational waves at the time, and said the density variations picked up were so small that any such waves must be weak. That made BICEP2's sighting all the more startling, as its gravitational wave signal is twice what Planck suggested.
"How do we reconcile them?" says Laura Mersini-Houghton at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. "That's the million-dollar question."
If the BICEP2 results hold up, they support the simplest models of inflation, which say that a hypothetical particle, the inflaton, drove the process. The issue would then be how the inflaton's energy changed over time – a detail that could tell us why inflation ended, and whether we live in a multiverse.
One leading model is known as chaotic inflation (see diagram, above right), put forward in the 1980s by Andrei Linde at Stanford University in California. Building on work by Alan Guth, it features an inflaton that decays quickly, but also allows quantum fluctuations to trigger new bursts of inflation, giving rise to other universes. (See "Who is the father of inflation?".)
Quantum seeds
Another contender is natural inflation, proposed by Katherine Freese at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor in 1993. In this model, the inflaton retains its peak energy for a relatively long time before decaying. That would keep inflation going long enough to explain the smoothness seen by Planck (http://ift.tt/1jkkPm7).
A third possible theory is Higgs-like inflation, in which the inflaton behaved like the recently discovered Higgs boson. The Higgs is the only known particle with an associated scalar field – one that does not act in a specific direction – which is a property the inflaton should share.
If the Planck team does see gravitational waves, but at a lower strength than BICEP2, the models get more complex. One solution is to have inflation that starts out fast and slows down abruptly, says Marco Peloso at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. Another is to assume that inflation was faster in one direction (http://ift.tt/1h6ZQ2W). This could explain an anomaly in the Planck data that suggests the universe has a "preferred" direction, nicknamed the axis of evil.
Pre-big bang
An even wilder way to square the discrepancy between Planck's smooth cosmos and BICEP2's strong ripples is to include physics from before the big bang.
In 2006, Mersini-Houghton and her colleagues devised a model in which the universe was seeded by a quantum particle, one in a sea of particles that existed before the big bang. Only those with high enough energies inflated and turned into universes, and all of those particles remained connected via the quantum property of entanglement.
"You have a second source of energy that comes from quantum entanglement with other universes," says Mersini-Houghton. Gravitational waves would still exist and could be as strong as BICEP2 reports, but the entanglement energy would suppress the density variations, making them even smaller than inflation should allow.
Connecting strings
The upcoming Planck data may even help rule out inflation. Instead, the universe could be the result of string gas cosmology, based on the multiple dimensions of string theory.
Picture the cosmos as a rolled-up piece of paper held in place with rubber bands, says Robert Brandenberger at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, who was part of a team that came up with the model in 1989.
If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.
