Manuel Schenkhuizen unpacks life as an esports athlete, from being watched constantly by online fans to the challenge of building a decent career
How did you get into pro gaming?
It's like these Idol shows. I didn't think I could ever be the best at anything. But people said I was pretty good and that I should try a competition. I won. And I won the next one and the next and the next. After I'd won some tournaments I was picked up by a well-known team and given a small salary. It wasn't much but I was still living at home at the time and I didn't have to get another job.
How often do you compete?
Several times a week online for sponsor money or for a qualifier. Once or twice a month I'll travel to a competition somewhere around the world.
Has the growth of esports turned what you do into a proper career, like playing soccer?
I don't really think soccer is a valid career choice, in that I don't think you choose to be a professional. In both cases, when you're really good and really lucky and the infrastructure is there, it sort of chooses you. Now, though, thanks to live-streaming of our games, the options for a professional gaming career are much broader.
Is streaming an essential part of being a pro gamer?
It is. It's also very fun. You get used to online feedback from the crowds, so playing by yourself with no one watching can get a little dull. I wouldn't have it any other way any more. You just need to find a good balance between streaming and practising.
Do you practise every day, like a musician? And is it common to have a coach?
Yes, it's just like that. I play between 4 and 9 hours a day. A lot of people could benefit from a coach, but I don't think esports is big enough yet. We do the best we can, by ourselves, with the people we care about and who care about us – it can be our partner, a teammate, friends. That's what I've experienced the last 10 or 11 years.
Do you stream your practice sessions, too?
Sometimes. But streaming isn't great for practice: we're entertainers when streaming, not just playing with a webcam. To make it a good show, we keep it high-paced, which makes it hard to learn from mistakes. You don't have time to reflect on a loss. You have to talk to the viewers, explain what just happened. And they'll have their ideas about it too. Sometimes the best thing to do after a game is to take a half-hour break or watch the replay very slowly, but that's boring for the viewer.
Do you have rivalries?
Not really. But there are people I like to beat. When you meet the same people a lot it starts to become this thing in your head; you remember all the history.
Is it fair to compare strategy games like StarCraft to chess, as people sometimes do?
As a professional player, it would be short-sighted to say StarCraft is more difficult than chess. But I can say it's more complicated. There are so many permutations, they're infinite. You couldn't explain all the rules in 10 hours. Chess gets really tough at a high level, but its rules are simple. And in StarCraft you also have to be fast.
Read more: "Esports: Video games jump from couch to stadium"
This article appeared in print under the headline "Guy's got game"
Profile
Manuel "Grubby" Schenkhuizen, 28, of the Netherlands, is a pro gamer who has been in three world-class teams. His game of choice: StarCraft 2. Freelance since 2011, he used to compete alongside his wife for the team Evil Geniuses
- New Scientist
- Not just a website!
- Subscribe to New Scientist and get:
- New Scientist magazine delivered every week
- Unlimited online access to articles from over 500 back issues
- Subscribe Now and Save
If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.
