The science of inequality deserves political attention


Policy-makers the world over urgently need to address the growing divide between haves and have-nots. Science has much to tell them – if only they would listen


Bridging the money gap (Image: Lalo de Almeida/Contrasto/Eyevine)


WITH the UK general election campaign in full swing and candidates for the US presidency starting to declare themselves, it's becoming clear that one issue is central to debate on both sides of the Atlantic: inequality.


Not many politicos are talking about it directly. But the gulf between the haves and have-nots shows up in wrangling over everything from tax avoidance to benefit cuts, property ownership, corporate power and the erosion of the middle class.


The arguments tend to focus on economics and politics. But that overlooks the contribution that science can make. As we reported nearly three years ago, science has much to say about inequality's causes and effects, from patterns of income distribution to the health consequences of living in unequal societies (28 July 2012, p 37). But these insights have not made their way into mainstream political debate.



Now comes a further twist: a society's level of inequality appears to be driven by the kinds of energy at its disposal. Foraging societies tend to be very equal and agrarian ones very unequal; those powered by fossil fuels fall in between (see "Morality is rooted in the way societies get their energy").


This new way of looking at the problem is very broad-brush, and its implications are not yet clear. It could be used to defend the status quo: inequality in today's Western societies is actually quite low by historical standards. On the other hand, it is rising – and those historical standards are not necessarily desirable.


But the new analysis could be the start of a deeper debate that connects two of the key issues of our times. Just as with inequality, concern about our energy use is evident all over the political map, on issues ranging from defence to the environment.


The deep connection between the two has so far had little attention from academics, let alone politicians. Now that the fossil fuel economy is reaching the end of the road this needs to change. On both issues, science is speaking; politicians would do well to listen.


This article appeared in print under the headline "Bridging the divide"


Issue 3017 of New Scientist magazine


  • New Scientist

  • Not just a website!

  • Subscribe to New Scientist and get:

  • New Scientist magazine delivered every week

  • Unlimited online access to articles from over 500 back issues

  • Subscribe Now and Save




If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.